Our story
Built for the parts of reporting that happen alone
A short account of why Marquon exists and what still drives it.
Marquon began after one too many conversations with reporters who had good material and nowhere to bring it before publication. A finished draft can go to an editor. A stack of interview notes, or a half-built structure for a piece that's still six weeks from done, usually can't.
We started in Denpasar working with a handful of freelance writers covering local institutions, and the shape of the work stayed close to that origin: sessions spaced around actual reporting time, written follow-ups instead of vague encouragement, and a refusal to touch anything resembling a criminal case — that's not our training, and pretending otherwise would do more harm than good.
What drives the work now is largely the same as what started it: the belief that a long investigative piece gets better with an outside read at the right moments, not a single edit at the end.
What we hold to
Three things that don't change between engagements
01
Read before advising
We don't offer direction until we've actually gone through the material — no generic notes on work we haven't read closely.
02
Stay in scope
Non-criminal subjects only. If a story moves toward something we're not suited for, we'll say so plainly and early.
03
Leave something written
A conversation is easy to forget. Every session ends with notes you can return to on your own.
The team
Who you'll actually work with
Wirawan Sastra
Founder & Lead Editor
Nadira Puspa
Research Lead
Galih Anantara
Notes & Structure Advisor